Role of Tailorability to Access Software Product Line Orthogonal Variability Model Maintainability
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
P. Clements, L. Northrop and L.M. Northrop, Software Product Line: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley Professional, August 2001.
ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001, Software Engineering-Product Quality-Part 1: Quality Model, Int’ 1 Organization for Standardization,2001, : URL: http://www.iso.org.
GeetikaVyas, Amita Sharma, AsthaPareek,Software Product Line Engineering:Paradigm for Product Family, International Journal of Information and computation Technology,ISSN-0974-2239, volume 3,(2013),pp355- 360.
FabriciaRooz-Frantz.A Preliminary Comparison of Formal Properties on Orthogonal Variability Model and Feature Models.
K.Pohl, G. Bockle and FJ. VnaderLinde. Software Product Line Engineering’ Foundation, Principles and Techniues, Springer,DE,2005.
FabricaRoos-Frantz, Sergio Seguria, Automated Analysis of Orthogonal Variability Models, A first step.
EbrahimBagheri, DraganGasevic. Assessing the maintainability of Software Product Line feature Models using Structural Metrics, National Research Council Canada, pp1-30.
M. Genero, J, OLiva. M. Piattini& F. Romero, “ Using Metrics to predict OO information system maintainability”, in Advance Information System Engineering, springer,2001,pp-388-401.
M. Manso, M. Genero& M. Piattini, “ No redundant metrics for UML class diagram structural complexity”, in Advance Information System Engineering, Springer,2010. Pp 1029-1029.
L. Briand, J Daly & D. Victor Porter, “Exploring the relationship between design measure and software quality in object oriented systems; Journal of Systems and Software, vol.51, no.3, 2000,pp-245-273.
Eisinga, R.TeGrotenhuis, M.;Pelzer,B, “The reliability of a two item scale: Pearson, Cronbach or Spearman- Brown?/International ournal of Public Health 58(4),2013, 637-642.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23956/ijarcsse.v9i7.1047
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.